Protecting health care in armed conflict: action towards accountability

The Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Ildefonso Castro, is one of the co-signers of the article published in the British medical journal The Lancet on Resolution 2286 of the Security Council.

This Resolution was adopted in 2016 when Spain was a member of this Council and its purpose is to protect, in a situation of armed conflict, the wounded and sick, medical and humanitarian personnel engaged in medical duties, their means of transport and equipment, as well as hospitals and other medical facilities.

Protecting health care in armed conflict: action towards accountability

 

Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Ildefonso Castro, Christiaan Rebergen, Matthew Rycroft, Iman Nuwayhid, Leonard Rubenstein, Ahmad Tarakji, Naz Modirzadeh, Homer Venters, Samer Jabbour

Published: 14 April 2018

Driven by a deplorable trend of unlawful attacks on health-care facilities and workers in armed conflicts throughout the world, on May 3, 2016, the UN Security Council (UNSC) adopted Resolution 2286 calling for an end to such attacks. The Secretary-General followed with recommendations of concrete measures for implementation. However, unlawful attacks on health care have continued or intensified in many conflicts, notably in Syria. We, academic institutions, civil society, and co-sponsoring Member States, convened a side event during the 72nd UN General Assembly to focus global attention on this issue and the imperative that Resolution 2286 be implemented.

Global attention to unlawful attacks on health care, including reporting on incidents and identification of the long-term consequences for the civilian population and the health-care systems of affected countries, has grown recently. But this attention has yet to translate into effective protection of health care on the ground. Despite Resolution 2286 having been adopted by consensus, the threat or use of veto by one or more permanent members has too often frustrated the Security Council’s attempts to address serious violations of international humanitarian law (IHL). The failure to condemn and to follow through reinforces impunity.

Resolution 2286 is important on multiple levels. It reaffirms IHL centrality, as enshrined in the Geneva Conventions, applicable Additional Protocols, and customary international law, and demands that parties to armed conflicts fully comply with their obligations to ensure respect and protection of all medical and humanitarian personnel exclusively engaged in medical duties, their means of transport and equipment, and hospitals and other medical facilities.

We see many other opportunities for action. Accountability of all parties concerned is the cornerstone of implementing Resolution 2286. Multiple paths exist to accountability. States that support the norms of civilian protection and sanctity of health care can take crucial action and lead the way, notably by implementing relevant recommendations of the Secretary-General to fulfil the objectives of Resolution 2286. Concrete steps include aligning domestic legislation with obligations under international law; training military personnel on protection of medical care in armed conflict; voluntary reporting on whether states are acting in accordance with Resolution 2286 regarding their own laws, practices, investigations, and accountability procedures; reporting on violations through relevant UN bodies as a mechanism to put pressure on perpetrators; assessing the potential risks that the transfer of conventional arms might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of IHL; where national accountability mechanisms are insufficient or inadequate, ensuring that appropriate international accountability mechanisms are established, or existing international accountability mechanisms are utilised; and ensuring that health workers who adhere to their ethical duty of providing impartial health care do not face arbitrary arrest and prosecution, contrary to IHL.

There is further scope for UN action. Commissions of inquiry and other monitoring and reporting mechanisms should devote more attention to investigating unlawful attacks on health care. The UN Secretariat could explore the establishment of a mechanism for sharing good practices to advance protection of health care in armed conflict and facilitate the creation of an experienced team from UN agencies, including WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, civil society, and non-governmental organisations, and academia, to improve the process of training, documenting, and following up on unlawful attacks on the health sector. Finally, as Resolution 2286 calls for, the Secretary-General should report to the Security Council situations where delivery of medical assistance to populations in need is being obstructed by parties to the armed conflict and should report actions taken by parties and humanitarian agencies to prevent violations, and actions taken to identify and hold accountable those who commit such acts.

Some recent developments are encouraging. These include WHO’s launch of an initiative to collect and disseminate data on indiscriminate attacks on health care, the Secretary- General’s 2017 annual report on Children in Armed Conflict naming perpetrators of grave violations against children’s rights during conflict (including unlawful attacks on hospitals), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health’s planned report on laws and practices that criminalise provision of impartial health-care services to people deemed enemies.

Critical as they are, accountability efforts need to be complemented by other actions that mobilise new partnerships and provide needed support to health providers facing the unimaginable burden of coping with violations. International civil society’s actions in documentation, advocacy, and coalition-building have proved crucial and deserve widespread support. A greater role for academia is important to mobilise the credible global voice of science against violations, facilitate exchange of evidence, and carry out crucial research. Such research includes further development of tools to verify and monitor attacks and measures to identify the impact of attacks on access to services for affected populations.

We must not be complacent; attacks on health care must not become the new global norm in armed conflict. We need to work together to ensure that IHL is upheld, health care is protected, affected populations are supported, and accountability for any such violations is pursued.

 

2018-04-16T21:25:25+00:00 16/04/2018|Categories: slider, Spain at the UN|